The Importance of the Indo-Pacific Region in the Geopolitical Perceptions of Regional and International Actors: The Chinese-Japanese Competition as a Model.

Authors

  • Omar Osamah Al-Jumaili Department of International Relations - Faculty of Political Science – Damascus University- Syria
  • Asst. Prof. Dr. Fadi khalil Department of International Relations - Faculty of Political Science – Damascus University – Syria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36473/ujhss.v62i1.1902

Keywords:

China, Japan, Indo-Pacific region, competition

Abstract

This study seeks to shed light on the reasons that led the academic community and most regional and international actors to adopt the “Indo-Pacific region” term in their declared geopolitical perceptions as a broader geostrategic space instead of the previous term “Asia-Pacific”. The new geographical space represents a regional and international polarization region that extends from the western coasts of the United States to the Indian Ocean region. This study also provides an example of the geostrategic importance posed by the Indo-Pacific region within the geopolitical perceptions of regional and international actors, by reviewing the dynamics of strategic competition between China and Japan in the Indo-Pacific region.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AIZAWA, N., & BLAND, B. (2020). RESOLVED: Japan Is Well-positioned to Counterbalance China in Southeast Asia. Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Chatzky, A., & McBride, J. (2020, January 28). Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved November 25, 2021, from China’s Massive Belt and Road Initiative: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-massive-belt-and-road-initiative

Chen, D. (2018, April 27). What China Thinks of the Indo-Pacific Strategy. Retrieved November 25, 2021, from The Diplomat: https://thediplomat.com/2018/05/what-china-thinks-of-the-indo-pacific-strategy/

Das, U. (2019, July 13). The Diplomat. Retrieved November 22, 2021, from What Is the Indo-Pacific?: https://thediplomat.com/2019/07/what-is-the-indo-pacific/

Defense of Japan. (2021). Retrieved November 22, 2021, from Achieving the “Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP)” Vision: https://www.mod.go.jp/en/d_act/exc/india_pacific/india_pacific-en.html

Defense of Japan. (2021). Retrieved November 25, 2021, from Major Exercises with Partner Nations in the Indo-Pacific: https://www.mod.go.jp/en/d_architecture/major-exercises/major_exercises_02.html

Dong, W. (2018, February 24). Rethinking the “Period of Strategic Opportunity” in the New Era. Retrieved from China Association for International Friendly Contact (CAIFC): http://www.caifc.org.cn/index.php?m=content&c=index&a=show&catid=22&id=533

Envall, H. D. (2016). Japan’s ‘Pivot’ Perspective: Reassurance, Restructuring, and the Rebalance. Security Challenges, 12(3), 1-82.

Grissler, J. R., & Vargö, L. (2021). The BRI vs FOIP: Japan’s Countering of China’s Global Ambitions. Institute for security and development policy.

HARUKO, W. (2020, March 16). THE “INDO-PACIFIC” CONCEPT GEOGRAPHICAL ADJUSTMENTS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS. (326), pp. 1-23.

Heath, T. (2013, November 7). Diplomacy Work Forum: Xi Steps Up Efforts to Shape a China-Centered Regional Order. China Brief, 13(22), pp. 1-17.

Heiduk, F., & Wacker, G. (2020). From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific:Significance, Implementation and Challenges. Berlin: German Institute for International and Security Affairs.

Kapila, S. (2018, September 9). China’s Maritime Silk Road Strategically Impacts Indo-Pacifc Security. Eurasia review.

Ministry of National Defense of the People's Republic of China. (2019). Retrieved November 25, 2021, from China's National Defense in the New Era: http://eng.mod.gov.cn/publications/2019-07/24/content_4846452.htm

Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance. (2018, AUGUST 24). Retrieved November 22, 2021, from China’s Anti-Access Area Denial: https://missiledefenseadvocacy.org/missile-threat-and-proliferation/todays-missile-threat/china/china-anti-access-area-denial/

NIDS. (2019). China Security Report 2019:China's Strategy for Reshaping the Asian Order and Its Ramifications. Tokyo: The National Institute for Defense Studies.

NIDS. (2020). China Security Report 2020: China Goes to Eurasia. Tokyo: National Institute for Defense Studies.

Pitakdumrongkit, K. K. (2019). The impact of the Trump Administration's Indo-Pacific strategy on regional economic governance. Honolulu: East-West Center.

Singh, T. (2012). South China Sea: Emerging Security Architecture. New Delhi: Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS).

Smith, S. A. (2021, May 27). The Quad in the Indo-Pacific: What to Know. Retrieved November 25, 2021, from Council on Foreign Relations: https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/quad-indo-pacific-what-know

Suzuki, H. (2020). Japan’s Leadership Role in a Multipolar Indo-Pacific. Center for Strategic and International Studies.

The EurAsian Times. (2018, March 31). Retrieved from China’s “String of Pearls” Strategy Resulted in India’s 1st Loss at the Indian Ocean: https://eurasiantimes.com/india-aptly-countering-chinas-string-of-pearls-in-the-indian-ocean/

Xuetong, Y. (2014, April 22). From Keeping a Low Profile to Striving for Achievement. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 153-184.

Downloads

Published

15-03-2023

How to Cite

The Importance of the Indo-Pacific Region in the Geopolitical Perceptions of Regional and International Actors: The Chinese-Japanese Competition as a Model. (2023). ALUSTATH JOURNAL FOR HUMAN AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 62(1), 168-183. https://doi.org/10.36473/ujhss.v62i1.1902

Similar Articles

21-30 of 63

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.