Evaluating the Content of English Curriculum of Intermediate ‎School from EFL Teachers’ Point of View

Authors

  • Asst. Lect. Ramziya Khaleel Ismael College of Education for Humanities University of Mosul/Iraq
  • Asst. Prof. Dr. Shoaib Saeed Fahady College of Education for Humanities University of Mosul/Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36473/ujhss.v61i3.1612

Keywords:

Evaluation‎, curriculum‎, ‎ textbook‎

Abstract

This research aimed at evaluating the textbook ‘English for Iraq’ for the third-year Intermediate grade from the teachers' point of view in the intermediate schools at the center of Mosul city. It also examined the statistical differences between the teachers’ responses referring to gender and years of experience. In order to achieve the purposes of this study, the researchers designed a checklist based on the related literature. A checklist consists of four main domains including 32 items. The sample of the study is chosen randomly from intermediate schools at the center of Mosul city. The total number of samples consists of (103) including (46) males and (57) females. The validity of the instrument was tested by six experts in curricula and teaching methods of English Language. In order to analyze the data, different statistical approaches are used such as percentage, means, standard deviation, frequencies, one sample T-test, independent samples T-test and One Way ANOVA. The study results find out the total score of the textbook evaluation is good for all four domains. The findings also show that there are no statistically significant differences between the views of teachers due to gender and years of experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almazloum, M. and Qeshta, A. (2009). Evaluating the Content of English for ‎Palestine, Grade Ten Textbook in the Light of the Standards for Foreign ‎Language Learning. Journal of Human Sciences, Issue 43, 7th Year, 42-‎‎95.‎

Aytuğ, S. (2007). “An EFL Textbook Evaluation Study in Anatolian

High Schools: ‘New Bridge to Success for 9th Grade New

Beginners’. M. A Thesis. Bilkent University. Ankara. Turkey.‎

Best, J.W. and Kahn, J.V. (2006). Research in Education. 10th Edition, Pearson ‎Education Inc.‎

Chen, H. T. (2015). Practical Program Evaluation: Theory-Dirven Evaluation ‎and the Integrated Evaluation Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.‎

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your Coursebook. Oxford, England: ‎Heinemann

Ellis, R. (1997). The Empirical Evaluation of Language Teaching Materials. ELT ‎Journal, 51(1), 36-42.‎

Heale, R. and Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and Reliability in Quantitative ‎Studies. Evid Based Nurs, Vol. 18, No. 3.66-67.‎

Hutchinson, T and Torres, E. (1994). The Textbook as Agent of Change. EL T ‎Journal, Volume 48/4,315-328. Oxford University Press.‎

Khalili, M .and Jodai, H. (2012). Evaluation of World View Textbooks; ‎Textbooks Taught at a Military University. The University OF Guilan -‎Iran.‎

Laabidi, H. (2016). Fundamental Criteria for Effective Textbook Evaluation. EFL ‎Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2. Fes Sais University, Morocco.‎

Lawrence, W. (2011). Textbook Evaluation: A framework for Evaluating the ‎Fitness the Hong Kong New Secondary School (NSS) Curriculum. City ‎University of Hong Kong. Retrieved from https://www.asian-efl-‎journal.com/Thesis/Thesis-Wong.pdf.‎

McGrath, I. (2002). Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching. ‎Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.‎

Miller, M. Linn, R. Gronlund, N. (2009). Assessment and Measurement in ‎Teaching.10th edition. Pearson international press.‎

ÖZ, Ö. (2019). A Post-Use Evaluation of an EFL Coursebook from the ‎Perspectives of Preparatory School Students and Instructors: A Mixed ‎Methods Study. Middle East Technical University. Retrieved from ‎https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/ 12623389/ index.pdf.‎

Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The New Century Text. ‎SAGE Publications.‎

Patten, M. (2000). Understanding Research Methods. (2nded.) USA: Pyrczak.‎

Richards, Jack C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. ‎Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization Regional Language ‎Centre (RELC), Singapore. Cambridge University Press.‎

Russ-Eft, D., and Preskill, H. (2009). Evaluation in Organizations: A systematic ‎approach to enhancing learning, performance, and change. New York: ‎Basic Books.‎

Scriven, M. (2016). Roadblocks to Recognition and Revolution. American ‎Journal of Evaluation, 37(1), 27–44.‎

Scriven, M. (2007). The logic and Methodology of Checklists. Kalamazoo, MI: ‎The Evaluation Center. Available at http://www.wmich. edu/ evalctr/ ‎checklists.‎

Shannon, P. (2010). Textbook Development and Selection. International ‎Encyclopedia of Education, (pp. 397-402). Elsevier ‎Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00065-8.‎

Sheldon, L.E. (1988). Evaluating ELT Textbooks and Materials.‎

‎ ELT Journal, 42(4),237-246.‎

Stern, H. (1992). Issues and Options in Language Teaching. Oxford University ‎Press.‎

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1973). Evaluation as Enlightenment for Decision-Making. In ‎B. R. Worthen and J. R. Sanders (Eds.), Educational Evaluation: Theory ‎and Practice. Worthington, OH: Charles A. Jones Publishing Company.‎

Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2011). Materials Development in Language Teaching. ‎Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.‎

Tomlinson, B. (Ed.) (2003). Developing Materials for Language Teaching. ‎London: Continuum.‎

Downloads

Published

15-09-2022

How to Cite

Evaluating the Content of English Curriculum of Intermediate ‎School from EFL Teachers’ Point of View. (2022). ALUSTATH JOURNAL FOR HUMAN AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 61(3), 516-530. https://doi.org/10.36473/ujhss.v61i3.1612

Similar Articles

1-10 of 95

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.