The Linguistic Structures That Underlie the Discretionary Tendency in Contemporary Arab and Islamic Thought - Najaf Fundamentalist School and Qom Fundamentalist School - A Model –

Abstract

The linguistic structure and its impact on the formation of ijtihad tendencies raise an essential issue of the link between words and their meanings, which bears the indication of the importance of the link and the relationship between language on the one hand, and ijtihad tendency on the other hand, and this relationship has accompanied and this connection raised a central question in the language About its nature and origin, which indicates this question of the juristic position of the language between the one who says the language and the one who says the language is conventional. Whoever says stop at the beginning and switch to idiomatic after that, and dealing with this central and essential question was not a simple and hasty treatment, but rather the interaction was complex and deliberate, the language was returned to the original units of letters, sounds and words, and every language compared it With another language, to reach the origin of linguistic nature and the basis of its inception. These views on the origin of the language were not new juristic jurisprudence, but rather a report, of a previous linguistic effort, in the Arabic-Islamic text and the Greek text. And the basic ideas about the linguistic structure have not undergone many modifications, as the reliance remains mainly on the meaning and the pronunciation, from the angle that languages ​​differ in letters, sounds and words, from one language to another, but they agree in the idea, meaning and necessity. This assertion about the advanced difference in the significance of sounds, letters and words, and the agreement in the significance of the idea, meaning and necessity, was offset by another direction. And both in the aforementioned issue of disagreement and agreement, and attention to the issue of the association of morphology and difference, there was clear agreement on the distinction between direct and indirect connotations. directly on the meaning, and this agreement explains the linear nature of the language, on the basis of which it formulated the ijtihad tendency, intentionally or unintentionally, its subjects. And if these trends in dealing preserved the essential from Aristotelian thought, they only made some interpretations